+ DOJ sues Los Angeles.

Global news you can trust.

Download the Reuters App.

 

The Afternoon Docket

The Afternoon Docket

A newsletter by Reuters and Westlaw

 

By Sara Merken

What's going on today?

  • The DOJ sued Los Angeles over immigration enforcement.
  • The jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial raised concerns about one juror.
  • The Trump administration appealed a ruling blocking an executive order against Perkins Coie.
 

What Republican, Democratic judges said about Trump’s law firm orders

 

REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Over the past two months, four separate federal judges in D.C. have sided decisively with each of the law firms that sued the Trump administration to block White House executive orders against them. In the latest ruling, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan on Friday permanently blocked an executive order against Susman Godfrey.

My colleague Mike Scarcella reported on highlights from the rulings, which said President Trump illegally restricted the firms' business in retaliation for cases they took or attorneys they hired. The White House has called the orders a legitimate exercise of presidential authority. The DOJ today appealed the ruling that blocked Trump's order against Perkins Coie.

Read the judges’ words here.

 

More top news

  • Trump victorious again as US Supreme Court wraps up its term
  • Meta, TikTok can be sued by mother of NYC teen killed while 'subway surfing'
  • Appeals court weighs Trump's use of wartime law to deport Venezuelans
  • Trump administration says EEOC firing was legal, moves to nix lawsuit
  • US judge orders Argentina to transfer YPF shares to help satisfy $16.1 billion judgment
  • UK's Oakley Capital to sell legaltech platform vLex to Clio at $1 billion valuation
  • Jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial raises concerns about one juror
  • Swiss privacy tech firm Proton sues Apple in US over app store rules
  • Global M&A powered by larger deals in first half, bankers show appetite for megadeals
  • Immigrants scramble for clarity after Supreme Court birthright ruling
  • Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may yet lose on birthright citizenship
  • US says it halts healthcare fraud schemes worth nearly $15 billion
  • Trump administration sues Los Angeles over immigration enforcement
 
 

U.S. Supreme Court Spotlight

 

REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

The U.S. Supreme Court threw out judicial decisions today that favored transgender people in cases from North Carolina, West Virginia, Idaho and Oklahoma, including in legal challenges to state health insurance programs that deny coverage for patients seeking gender-affirming medical treatment.

The court separately agreed to hear a Republican-led challenge on free speech grounds to a provision of federal campaign finance law that limits spending by political parties in coordination with candidates running for office, in a case involving Vice President JD Vance.

More Supreme Court news: 

US Supreme Court to review billion-dollar Cox Communications copyright case

US Supreme Court to hear Enbridge's venue challenge to Michigan's pipeline case

US Supreme Court rejects American Airlines appeal of ruling barring JetBlue alliance

US Supreme Court seeks Justice Department views on Bayer's Roundup appeal

US Supreme Court won't hear free speech fight over teacher fired for social media posts

US Supreme Court rejects Exxon's appeal of $14.25 million air pollution penalty

 

In other news ...

The U.S. and Canada will resume trade talks after Ottawa dropped its digital services tax … Immigration raids have left crops unharvested and California farms at risk … Trump is expected to visit “Alligator Alcatraz” migrant detention center this week … Italy will issue half a million non-EU work visas over the next three years. Plus, a look at how Syrian government forces and factions are linked to the mass killings of Alawites.