The Morning: Netanyahu’s war
Plus, immigration, tariffs and federal layoffs.
The Morning
July 11, 2025

Good morning. Here’s the latest news:

  • California: Federal agents clashed with protesters during an immigration raid at a cannabis farm. Agents fired crowd control munitions; demonstrators threw objects at their vehicles. (See a video.)
  • Tariffs: President Trump threatened to impose a 35 percent tariff on Canadian imports from Aug. 1, upending trade talks.
  • Federal employees: The State Department told workers that it was about to begin layoffs, two days after the Supreme Court allowed the administration to slash the federal work force.

We have more on those stories below. But first, we talk to one of the journalists behind a major new story about Benjamin Netanyahu.

A black-and-white image of Benjamin Netanyahu in profile.
Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington, D.C.  Eric Lee for The New York Times

Netanyahu’s war

Author Headshot

By Jodi Rudoren

I covered two prior Gaza wars and was Jerusalem bureau chief from 2012 to 2015.

Why has the Gaza war lasted so long? In a blockbuster investigative profile published this morning, the Times Magazine explains how Benjamin Netanyahu prolonged it partly for personal political reasons. Our Jerusalem bureau chief, Patrick Kingsley, and his colleagues Ronen Bergman and Natan Odenheimer spent six months interviewing more than 110 people and reviewing scores of military and government documents.

I spoke to Patrick — who is leaving his role this summer after four and a half years in what many have called the hardest job in journalism — about Netanyahu, the war and how they got people to share so many secrets.

Today is the 643rd day since the Oct. 7 attacks. Nobody imagined the war would go on this long. Why is it still going?

The strategic argument was that it gave Israel a better chance of defeating not only Hamas but also Hamas’s regional allies, Hezbollah and Iran. Whether you buy that argument or not, our reporting shows that Netanyahu was clearly often motivated by his personal interest instead of only by these national priorities.

There were key turning points when Netanyahu chose to continue the war to prevent the collapse of his coalition government. Fearing a domestic backlash, Netanyahu also refused to finalize a clear postwar plan for Gaza, leading to an aimless battlefield strategy that killed tens of thousands, stained Israel’s reputation — and still allowed Hamas to survive.

A large crowd of people walks across a dusty, destroyed landscape with damaged buildings in the distance.
North of Gaza City.  Saher Alghorra for The New York Times

The article opens on a remarkable scene at an April 2024 cabinet meeting. A truce was on the table — almost. What happened?

After months of stalling, Netanyahu had softened his negotiating position, raising the chances of a cease-fire and hostage release deal. His aides were preparing to present this new position to government ministers. Then a hard-right minister threatened to bring down the government if the deal went ahead. Netanyahu chose to continue the war rather than see his government collapse.

You, Ronen and Natan uncovered so many things that have never been reported before. People should read the whole story, but can you tease them here with a few of the most telling tidbits?

There’s a moment in a hospital when Netanyahu was in pajamas after being fitted with a pacemaker, and a security chief called to warn him of a looming attack. There’s the phone call, minutes into the Oct. 7 attack, when he first learns about the scale of the raid. There’s the attempt by his team to alter the official record of that phone call. There’s a surprise appearance by the Saudi crown prince, fraught conversations between Netanyahu and President Joe Biden, and a decisive meeting where he tells the military leadership to bomb Gaza with even more intensity.

When I covered Netanyahu a decade ago, he was universally assessed as risk-averse, letting conflicts simmer rather than embark on all-out wars like the ones we’ve seen the last two years. What changed?

In some senses, he is still the same Netanyahu that you knew — he still keeps lots of options open, avoiding key decisions until the last moment. We see that in his monthslong deferral of all-out confrontation with Hezbollah and Iran last year. But he has gradually taken more risks. Ultimately, he did choose to invade Lebanon, assassinate Hezbollah’s leadership, invade Syria and brazenly bombard Iran.

These choices are partly about a shift in the Israeli psyche. To Israel’s critics, the Hamas attack was an inevitable reaction to Israel’s blockade of Gaza and occupation of the West Bank. But to many Israelis, the attack was the result of Israel’s timidity, its failure to deal pre-emptively with the threat that Hamas posed.

Our colleague wrote recently that Israel has managed over the last two years to vanquish its enemies but also alienate its friends. What does that portend for its future?

In diplomatic terms, Israel has a foot in two parallel realities. In the first, Israel’s global standing has rarely been lower. In the second, Israel is edging closer to breakthroughs with longtime foes, defying the logic that the war in Gaza has left it irrevocably isolated. Even as Israel’s reputation worsens within American and Arab societies, Israeli envoys are simultaneously engaged in back-channel talks with officials in Syria that could firm up Israel’s standing in the Middle East. It’s a bizarre and confusing situation.

Netanyahu is 75 and Israel’s longest-tenured prime minister, serving nearly 18 years in three stints. Yet there is no hint of him being ready to retire.

A few longtime Netanyahu watchers think he might bow out if he establishes formal ties with Saudi Arabia and other Arab states. Coupled with the Iran campaign, he might then have secured enough military and diplomatic triumphs to restore his domestic legacy, even as his global reputation is in tatters.

But for years, Netanyahu has refused to resign despite being prosecuted for corruption (a charge he denies). He has not given the impression of ever wanting to call it a day.

Read the full story here.

More on the Middle East

THE LATEST NEWS

Trade

  • As justification for his threatened tariffs on Canada, Trump repeated discredited claims about the flow of fentanyl across the U.S.-Canada border.
  • For months, the son of the former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro pressed the U.S. to sanction the judge prosecuting his father. By threatening harsh tariffs on Brazil, Trump opted for something bigger.
  • Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Brazil for political, rather than economic, reasons raises new legal questions about the president’s powers over trade.

Government Agencies

Immigration

A worker holding a basket stands at the base of a ladder in a grove of fruit trees.
In Fresno County, Calif. Zaydee Sanchez for The New York Times

Texas Floods

  • Officials in Kerr County, Texas, where recent floods killed dozens, tried for years to secure funding for a flood alarm, The Times found.
  • The president and Melania Trump are expected today to tour areas of Central Texas devastated by flooding.
  • Your pick: The most clicked article in The Morning yesterday was about what happened after floodwaters engulfed a 60-room inn along the Guadalupe River.
  • In a video, Judson Jones, a Times meteorologist and reporter, explains why catastrophe struck Central Texas despite a series of warnings from the National Weather Service. Click below.

International

  • Unregulated rare earth mining in Myanmar, directed by Chinese enterprises, is poisoning rivers that flow through Thailand.
  • Archaeologists unearthed the 1,700-year-old tomb of a Maya ruler in Belize. They found a rare mosaic death mask and elaborate jewelry buried with his body.

Other Big Stories

  • Twenty-seven workers escaped a collapsed tunnel in Los Angeles, emerging five miles away without major injury.
  • A Mississippi sheriff said he had no idea his deputies were brutally assaulting people. He knew the entire time, a Times investigation found.

IN ONE CHART

A chart shows the value of corporate giants, plotted quarterly over the last 25 years. Nvidia reached a $4 trillion valuation before other tech giants like Microsoft, Apple and Amazon.
Source: LSEG Data & Analytics | By The New York Times

Yesterday, Nvidia became the first public company worth $4 trillion. It reached this milestone before many better-known tech giants, including Apple and Microsoft. Read more about Nvidia’s rise, its control over the A.I. chip market and what competition it faces in the future.

OPINIONS

Planning codes often discourage new high-rises, but as the world gets hotter we need the shadows they cast, Sam Bloch argues.

Here are columns by David Brooks on the fall of literary fiction and Zeynep Tufekci on chatbots.

Everything The Times offers. All in one subscription.

Morning readers: Save on unlimited access to The Times with this introductory offer.

MORNING READS

A view of an ornate building and steeple, with a geometric garden in the foreground.
On the Grand-Place in Brussels.  Max Pinckers for The New York Times

36 Hours in Brussels: Take in a masterpiece of Belgian Baroque architecture and delve into the country’s beer history.

Nantucket: A majority of the island’s housing units are occupied by seasonal residents. That leaves teachers and police officers to live in substandard housing.

Rental cars: Hertz is increasingly relying on A.I. scanners to flag even tiny dings. Customers aren’t happy.

Lives Lived: The keyboardist Dave “Baby” Cortez reached No. 1 on the Billboard singles chart in 1959. But his stardom was short-lived. Aside from a brief comeback in 2011, he largely abandoned music and dropped out of sight. In recent weeks it was discovered that he had died in 2022, at age 83, and was buried in an unmarked grave.

SPORTS