relay icon

by Firefox Relay

0 email trackers removed

Upgrade for more protection

California Edition
TV has enough challenges without politics in the mix.
View in browser
Bloomberg

Welcome to Bloomberg’s California Edition—covering all the events shaping one of the world’s biggest economies and its global influence. Join us each week as we put a unique lens on the Golden State. Sign up here if you’re not already on the list.

ABC’s snap suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! on Wednesday cements “political pressure” on the laundry list of things weighing down Hollywood.

The saga began when Nexstar Media, which has of dozens of ABC affiliates and a pending acquisition of rival Tegna, pulled Kimmel’s show from its stations hours after FCC Chairman Brendan Carr blasted the comedian’s televised remarks tied to Charlie Kirk’s murder. Disney followed suit, removing the show from all of ABC indefinitely.

The action followed CBS’ cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in July. Paramount, CBS’ parent, was in the process of getting federal approval to be acquired by Skydance Media, a backdrop that industry observers suggested could spur broadcasters to tone down their more contentious shows.

With corporate deals and TV shows at the mercy of political pressure, Hollywood faces yet another obstacle. TV studio output fell 35% in the US last year from its 2022 peak, and another 12% in the first half of this year. The industry’s biggest landlord, Michael Hackman’s MBS group, cut about 100 jobs earlier this month as demand for studio space plunged. Paramount is weighing an offer for Warner Bros. Discovery, which could result in losses of thousands of jobs

President Trump praised the suspension of Kimmel’s show, just as he celebrated the end of Colbert’s show, which will air its final episode next May. A close ally of Kirk and a longtime critic of mainstream media, Trump told reporters on Thursday that TV stations which air shows denouncing his administration should possibly have their licenses revoked.

What was once late-night irreverence now feels increasingly like corporate liability. As political tempers flare and megadeals reshape the media landscape, Hollywood’s ability to withstand controversy looks shakier than ever.

“I’m sure the comedians taping shows tonight can’t help but feel skittish given the speed at which this late-night epic is unfolding,” said Robert Thompson, director of the Bleier Center for Television and Popular Culture at Syracuse University.

Democratic lawmakers gather at the US Capitol on Thursday to call for FCC Chairman Brendan Carr to resign after ABC announced it's taking Kimmel’s show off the air indefinitely. Photographer: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg

The Latest

A Paramount-Warner Bros. Combo Would Add to LA Job Market Woes
CMBS Pioneer Penner Launches Long-Shot Bid for California Governor
Beverly Hills Office Sells for $205 Million, More Than Double Its 2005 Price
University of California Head Sees ‘Dark Shadow’ From Trump Plan
Tesla Is Redesigning Door Handles That Drew Safety Scrutiny
California Regulator Warns Oil Traders They’re Being Watched

Up Front

In the fight against Arnold Schwarzenegger and Berkshire Hathaway heir Charlie Munger Jr., Gavin Newsom is turning to a group of long-time, deep-pocketed allies: California's unions.

Unions have poured more than $14.5 million into Newsoms redistricting campaign, filings show, making organized labor the biggest supporter of the governor's effort to redraw California's congressional maps in favor of Democrats. Records filed Thursday show the United Brotherhood of Carpenters doled out $2 million, adding to other big-ticket donations from the state's largest teachers' union and the California Nurses Association.

A powerful political force in the state, California's unions have often stepped in when Newsom needed cash, helping fund his efforts to fight a recall in 2021. They’re back in the governor’s corner one again, bringing the firepower to take on his rivals.

Newsom's side of the redistricting battle has raised at least $38.4 million, nearly matching the roughly $36 million his opponents have mustered to block it. The governor is up against an unlikely coalition: Munger, former House speaker Kevin McCarthy and onetime California Governor Schwarzenegger, who last month posted a photo of himself wearing a shirt reading “Terminate Gerrymandering.”—Eliyahu Kamisher

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks about the “Election Rigging Response Act” at a press conference in August.  Photographer: Mario Tama/Getty Images North America

More From Bloomberg California

Tech In Depth
TikTok Algorithm That Keeps Us Scrolling Remains at Heart of a Deal
Power On
Apple Pitches a Return to Its Design Roots, Six Years After Jony Ive’s Exit
Screentime
David Ellison Looks to Break Hollywood’s Merger Curse
Artificial Intelligence
OpenAI Wants to Create a Public Benefit Corporation. What Does That Mean?
Explainer
Why the Supreme Court Lifted a Ban on Migrant Profiling by ICE

Opinion

Proposals like California’s No Vigilantes Act reflect unease with masked ICE agents but are unlikely to withstand legal challenges, writes Stephen L. Carter. That’s because the Supremacy Clause blocks states from using anti-mask laws against federal officers. The emotional response to masks may drive political support, but they risk escalating tensions without altering federal enforcement.

More opinions:

Today’s Big Number