I'd wake up with a hose solid enough to put out a small garbage fire now I'm like halfway there on a normal day.
Back in college, I could get blackout drunk, and STILL, get rock hard and come like it was no problem whatsoever, without even remembering what had happened.
I was always turned on, and even something as small as a cute girl in a short dress was enough to trigger me to get hard.
Now not so much.
Maybe it's because of age.
Maybe it's lack of exercise, or a poor diet, or standing too much, or who the hell even knows .my junk doesn't work like it used to, and my urge is not as high as it once was.
This realization sort of bummed me out
But after some research it seemed like adding 5 specific plant-based foods to my diet, it'd make a big impact on my sex life.
And there were a lot of positive reviews online so I figured why not.
I'm not gonna lie at first, I was skeptical.
I didn't think anything would happen but I realized I became more sensitive
Everything from a picture of a cute girl in a bikini, to a gust of wind going up my basketball shorts, would get my motor going
Whenever I did have sex I got rock hard, right away, basically on command
I also REMAINED hard for much longer than I used to, so the women in my life were very pleased, and often came back for seconds the next day.
AND by far my favorite part orgasming feels way better now.
I didn't realize it before, but I used to come A LOT more when I was younger, and I didn't even realize that my orgasms had become lackluster.
I feel ten pounds lighter every time I blow my load, it's awesome, and the women take it as a compliment.
If you want to stop, please go here and make it end.
ontally. However, horizontal alignment maximizes exposure to bending forces and failure from stresses such as wind, snow, hail, falling debris, animals, and abrasion from surrounding foliage and plant structures. Overall leaves are relatively flimsy with regard to other plant structures such as stems, branches and roots. Both leaf blade and petiole structure influence the leaf's response to forces such as wind, allowing a degree of repositioning to minimize drag and damage, as opposed to resistance. Leaf movement like this may also increase turbulence of the air close to the surface of the leaf, which thins the boundary layer of air immediately adjacent to the surface, increasing the capacity for gas and heat exchange, as well as photosynthesis. Strong wind forces may result in diminished leaf number and surface area, which while reducing drag, involves a trade off of also reducing photosynthesis. Thus, leaf design may involve compromise between carbon gain, thermoregulation and water loss on the one hand, and the cost of sustaining both static and dynamic loads. In vascular plants, perpendicular forces are spread over a larger area and are relatively flexible in both bending and torsion, enabling elastic deforming without damage. Many leaves rely on hydrostatic support arranged around a skeleton of vascular tissue for their strength, which depends on maintaining leaf water status. Both the mechanics and architecture of the leaf reflect the need for transportation and support. Read and Stokes (2006) consider two basic models, the "hydrostatic" and "I-beam leaf" form (see Fig 1). Hydrostatic leaves such as in Prostanthera lasianthos are large and thin, and may involve the need for multiple leaves rather single large leaves because of the amount of veins needed to support the periphery of large leaves. But large leaf size favors efficiency in photosynthesis and water conservation, involving further trade offs. On the other hand, I-beam leaves such as Banksia marginata involve specialized structures to stiffen them. These I-beams are formed from bundle sheath extensions of sclerenchyma meeting stiffened sub-epidermal layers. This shifts the balance from reliance on hydrostatic pressure to structural support, an obvious advantage where water is relatively scarce. Long narrow leaves bend more easily than ovate leaf blad
