|
Can Video Podcasts Succeed on Netflix Where Gaming Could Not?
Netflix's platform is built for recommendation, not interaction. Gaming failed without community features. Now podcasts face the same test—can passive TV viewing work without comments?
 |
| |||||||||||||||
[Author’s Note: Snow day in NYC, so you’re receiving two Netflix essays today. The first connects last week’s Q4 earnings analysis to their video podcast launch. The second reveals what both decisions say about their demoted “flywheel” strategy. The flywheel section is paywalled because it digs deeper into the strategic implications that paying subscribers find most valuable.]
Last week, Netflix launched its video podcast deal with Spotify—which it announced last October. The timing raises a question: Can video podcasts succeed on Netflix’s platform the way gaming could not?
Both face the same architectural constraint. Netflix did not build the community features that make games succeed on other platforms. They removed friction—no ads, no fees, no in-app purchases—but could not provide what gamers value: community and creation tools. The result was underperformance.
Will video podcasts without comments, chat, or other interactive features follow the same pattern?
 |
One-to-Many
Netflix’s platform is built for one-to-many delivery for over 325 million members. Algorithms read behavior to refine suggestions. Its recommendation engine does this better than any competitor.
Netflix lacks the architecture for many-to-many interaction: Users talking to each other via commenting or discussion threads. Community features that shift attention from what Netflix recommends to deeper engagement with content.
Building comments would require Netflix to become a different kind of company. YouTube and Reddit spent years developing moderation systems to manage user-generated content at scale. Netflix has no institutional knowledge for this work. The same gap appeared when they tried gaming—they could deliver 50 million downloads of “GTA: San Andreas” but could not offer the community features or creation tools that sustain engagement on Roblox or Epic. As of December 2025, they no longer offer the game.
The Passive Viewing Bet
Podcasts may work differently than gaming.
YouTube users streamed over 700 million hours of video podcasts on their TVs in October 2025—a 75% increase year over year. Interest in the content and the ability to view it on connected TVs drove that growth. Netflix recently told The New York Times that roughly 70% of its audience watches programs on television sets.
Netflix is betting on YouTube-like growth in TV consumption from podcasts. If most viewing happens on televisions, the interactive features that matter on smartphones—comments, timestamps, discussion—may be marginally valuable. Podcasts could work as passive viewing. Interview shows and narrative series do not require participation the way multiplayer games do.
The bet is that audiences will watch podcasts like television rather than participate like YouTube viewers.
The Test
The answer depends on where viewing happens. On televisions, podcasts may perform like any other Netflix content: watch, finish, move on. On smartphones, the absence of comment sections may matter more. YouTube’s podcast growth came from both screens. Netflix will learn whether the TV audience alone is enough.
The Spotify deal brings Netflix premium podcast content from proven creators. What it does not bring is the architecture that makes video podcasts work on YouTube—the comments, the community, the many-to-many interaction.
The press release framing is revealing. Netflix called it “a curated selection of video podcasts” that “adds fresh voices” to the lineup. Spotify called it “a completely new distribution opportunity.” Neither mentioned features. Neither mentioned community. Both described a licensing deal—content moving through a new pipe.
We will learn whether that matters. Gaming suggested it does. Podcasts will confirm or complicate that lesson.
Essays related to today’s analysis:
 |