Hello!
I’ve been ruminating on a comment by the European Union energy commissioner Dan Jorgensen about the Iran war and its impact on energy prices.
"We really do need to get rid of our dependency on gas as fast as possible. So for us, this means speeding up more clean energy," he told Reuters.
Are countries really ramping up their renewable energy implementation?
India and China have doubled down on green hydrogen at the same time that the West has quietly backed away from its ambitious green hydrogen goals from the start of this decade after cost constraints proved stickier than anticipated.
Plus, investors are betting on renewable energy stocks in China, the dominant maker of solar gear, on expectations that the war will boost global demand for renewables.
Countries in Southeast Asia and Africa rushed to import solar panels from China ahead of expected price increases due to an end to China's export tax refunds on April 1, with the surge amplified by disruption to energy supplies due to the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, analysts said.
The same rush for solar panels can be seen in Europe as demand for rooftop solar systems across the region has surged since the start of the Iran war, as households rush to shield themselves from soaring power prices triggered by the worst global energy disruption in history.
Over in the United States, a federal judge blocked President Donald Trump's administration from enforcing a series of permitting policies that wind and solar energy industry groups say have stymied the development of new energy generation projects.
But one avid reader pointed out that these are short-term movements following the ‘renewables paradox’ newsletter on March 27, which explored how higher prices help revenue, but higher rates pressure renewables projects.
“The real constraint now is delivery, not viability. Permitting, grid capacity and skills shortages are slowing deployment, even as the economic case for renewables strengthens,” said Harry Benham, senior adviser at independent financial think tank Carbon Tracker.
So, what now? Governments and climate leaders are gathering in Santa Marta, Colombia, for the first Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels from today until April 29.
Delegates will be gathering to discuss the follow-up to the United Nations General Assembly resolution led by Vanuatu on state obligations regarding climate change, turning the International Court of Justice’s July 2025 opinion into actionable, mandatory climate measures.
“Phasing out our fossil fuels, delivering climate justice, and addressing climate harms are legal obligations, not political choices,” said Rebecca Brown, CEO and President of The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL).
“Pushback from some countries – especially on fossil fuel language – only underscores the stakes. States that continue expanding fossil fuels, or ignoring climate harms, are acting unlawfully and risk real legal and political consequences,” said Brown.
“The science is clear. The law is clear. What’s missing is political will. This resolution is the bridge from principle to practice. Governments now face a choice: act in line with the law or be held accountable for failing both people and the planet.”