Elon Musk in Oakland, California on April 28, 2026. Jessica Christian/San Francisco Chronicle/Getty ImagesYou can’t deny that there isn’t something poetic about a judge telling the owner of a social media platform to put a sock in it.
But that’s precisely what happened yesterday at the Musk v. Altman trial.
xAI CEO Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman—the Voldemort and Harry Potter of the Wizarding World of AI—haven’t shied away from trading barbs over social media about their lawsuit, in which Musk accused Altman and OpenAI president Greg Brockman of “stealing a charity.”
“Really excited to get Elon under oath in a few months, Christmas in April!” Altman posted two months ago.
“Scam Altman,”
Musk posted two
days ago, just as judicial proceedings got underway.
In court on Tuesday, the judge made her disapproval known. “Control your propensity to use social media to make things worse outside this courtroom,” U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers warned both parties.
Musk said he was merely responding to public statements that OpenAI’s leadership had made. “Only after they posted very publicly about this case, only then did I respond,” Musk said.
The judge’s solution? “Clean slate beginning today,” she said. Musk, Altman, and Brockman agreed.
The trial stands to be a memorable one, if only because it will expose communications from the early days of the most valuable private AI company on the planet. Stay tuned.
—AN