glp-1s
Hims' sales miss as telehealth competition grows
Hims & Hers reported yesterday $608 million in first quarter sales, less than the $617 million estimated by analysts surveyed by Visible Alpha. It also reported a net loss of $92 million, while analysts estimated net income of $33 million.
Shares of the company fell in after-hours trading.
Hims was one of the most prominent telehealth companies offering compounded GLP-1 drugs even after the brand-name versions were no longer in shortage. But in early March, it agreed in a deal with Novo Nordisk to stop marketing compounded versions and instead promote the branded drugs.
With that, it's becoming more similar to the many other telehealth companies that have partnered with Novo and Eli Lilly — such as Ro and Weight Watchers.
drug access
Viiv loses case that could affect global drug access
Viiv Healthcare has been trying to challenge Colombia's decision to issue a compulsory license for the company's HIV treatment Tivicay. Such a license allows a generic drugmaker to copy a patented medicine without the consent of the brand-name company.
ViiV, which is largely controlled by GSK, argues that compulsory licenses weaken the intellectual property system that biotechs rely on to make innovative treatments.
But a South American court has now sided with Colombia. Patient advocates hailed it as a “historic decision” and said it provides judicial backing for governments that want to use compulsory licenses to protect public health.
Read more from STAT's Ed Silverman.
biotech
Opinion: the U.S. drug industry is self-destructing
U.S. drug executives are allowing their own industry to falter as China's biotechs grow more competitive, one writer argues in a new opinion piece.
Executives in the U.S. are too focused on short-term costs, writes Olivia Kosloff, a co-chair of a working group at the Council on Foreign Relations investigating the U.S.’s generic pharmaceutical dependence on China.
They're flocking to China to license drug candidates, which “has the hallmarks of a gold rush — but it will destroy American biotech,” she writes.
Read more.