The Trump administration faced a skeptical federal appeals court today in its bid to revive the Republican leader’s executive orders punishing four major U.S. law firms, testing the scope of presidential power after judges in Washington resoundingly rejected the measures as unlawful.
A law firm's business relationships, including the lawyers it hires, are not protected by the First Amendment, DOJ lawyer Abhishek Kambli told a D.C. Circuit panel.
Former Republican-appointed U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, arguing for the law firms, countered that Trump's executive orders "strike at the heart of the First Amendment and the ability of lawyers to zealously represent their clients."
Today's arguments drew a crowd of more than 100 attorneys and other spectators in the courthouse's ceremonial courtroom in downtown Washington.
Read more about the arguments here.