Last Wednesday, blue-leaning Tempe, Ariz. turned off its Flock automated license plate readers and said the city would not seek another company to replace the system, citing “
risk of misuse.”
Three hours later, the nearby red-leaning town of Cave Creek did the same.
The same day in Washington, D.C., Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, opened a formal investigation into the company, while independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders posted a lengthy statement pledging to introduce legislation against it.
The lawmakers sit at opposite ends of the Senate’s ideological spectrum, but Flock’s rapid expansion, and the scrutiny now following it, has captured their attention.
In his letter, Hawley wrote that Flock has built an “unprecedented national surveillance network” of more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states, scanning more than 20 billion vehicles a month, and that “Congress never authorized the network your industry has built.”
By its own account, Flock’s cameras have helped close roughly a million police investigations and locate about 10,000 missing people over the past year.
But an August
Washington Post investigation
found more than 50 law enforcement officers had been accused, charged with, or convicted of misusing automated license plate readers, including cases where officers used the systems to track former partners.
As of Wednesday, the anti-surveillance group DeFlock says more than 90 cities have moved to cancel or reject Flock contracts.
The company has since reduced its default data retention window from 30 days to seven and now requires officers to enter a case code before accessing stored data. But Flock CEO Garrett Langley
told Fox News the country needs “compromise” between privacy and safety concerns.
Whether that arrives before more policymakers take action remains to be seen.
—Catherina Gioino