Gosh, lots of strong thoughts over The Grapes of Wrath vs. East of Eden. Though, generally, the answer seems to be “whichever one I read in high school.” Here’s some of what you all had to say.
Wayne S. wrote: “I have read The Grapes of Wrath multiple times. It is a great book. What makes it great? The story asks questions about America and getting by in America that are still relevant today. The blend of general chapters and plot chapters give the novel a depth that wouldn't have been possible if he'd only focused on the Joads. This is an aspect of the novel that cannot transfer to the film (as much as I love the film). The growth of Tom as he realizes what is happening in the country, similarly, is not fully carried over into the film. As for East of Eden, I have only read the novel once, although I intend to read it again. I did enjoy it quite a bit, but it does not have the depth and power of The Grapes of Wrath. Steinbeck's passion for the American people comes through in The Grapes of Wrath. I did not find that same passion in East of Eden.”
Dan’l D. wrote: “I think Eden to be far the superior novel. The ending of Grapes, frankly, depends too much on a combination of sentiment and shock value. Eden, for all that at times it feels like what a soap opera would be if it were written by someone who could really write, just powers through climax after climax and never cheats on any of them. Its structure of echoes and recurring callbacks kept me up thinking and feeling last night far past my bedtime. A book of saints, men and women, and monsters.”
Chris M. wrote: “I prefer East of Eden over The Grapes of Wrath, but my personal favorite of Steinbeck’s is Cannery Row ever since I read it in high school. Please don’t joke about The Pearl becoming popular though. I love Steinbeck, but The Pearl is one of my least favorite books of all time, and I read it twice just to be sure!”
See you next week!
P.S., if a friend sent you this newsletter and you want to sign up, the place to do it is npr.org/newsletter/books. :) |