FREETHEANIMAL.COM | READ ONLINE

Joe Rogan, Mel Gibson, Dr William Makis, Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Cancer

Let's round this up

Well, it’s been a few months since I last dove into this cesspool of a topic, and I thought I’d already posted it out of my mind. Turns out, I didn’t. Many have been yapping about this Joe Rogan interview with none other than the infamous, prolific, and perpetually controversial Hollywood heavyweight, Mel Gibson. Yeah, the Australian-born, ass-kicking actor, director, and producer of some of the most iconic films out there. Go figure. So, Rogan sat down with him for one of those marathon, long-form chats—two or three months back, I don’t know, who’s counting? But there was a particular chunk of that interview that caught fire, and for good reason. (no money)

I've always loved Mel on many levels. Honest, flawed man.

In this segment, Mel dropped a bombshell. He recounted how three of his close friends, all battling late-stage, terminal cancer, managed to achieve complete remission. Complete. Fucking. Remission. He was cagey about naming the exact treatments at first, but eventually, it came out: ivermectin and fenbendazole. You heard that right. The same stuff that’s been dragged through the mud by the establishment, dismissed as “horse dewormer” or some other bullshit, apparently played a role in pulling these people back from the brink. That snippet of the interview didn’t just get attention; it exploded. Went viral. People couldn’t shut up about it.

But here’s where it gets even crazier. Out of the woodwork crawls an actual oncologist—a long-term, highly credentialed cancer specialist from Canada. This guy isn’t some quack peddling snake oil; he’s educated at a medical school that’s basically the Canadian equivalent of Harvard Med. He’s published around 100 papers, so he’s not just talking out of his ass. And get this: he’s been using ivermectin and fenbendazole in his own practice for years, achieving results that can only be described as fucking astounding. Then, he drops the mic by saying he believes one of the patients Mel was talking about might actually be one of his own.

So, there you have it. A Hollywood legend, a podcast giant, and a top-tier doctor all converging on a story that the mainstream medical mafia would rather bury under a pile of their own horseshit. This isn’t just a feel-good anecdote; it’s a middle finger to the system that’s been gaslighting us for years. And I’m here for it. Let’s keep digging, because the truth always has a way of clawing its way to the surface, no matter how deep they try to bury it.

Now, here's Dr. William Makis explaining it all, and it's about 30 minutes into where you can't turn it off. I’ve stumbled across something damn interesting, and I’ve got to lay it out for you. There’s this video interview with a YouTube personality named John Campbell, PhD. He’s not an MD, not a “doctor” in the medical sense, but a PhD and, more crucially, a nurse. Yeah, a nurse, but never mind. This guy’s been a training nurse for years, and during the whole Covid shitshow, he carved out a massive platform for himself. His YouTube channel boasts 2.2 million subscribers, including a hell of a lot of doctors and PhDs. Why? Because Campbell played it straight as an arrow during the pandemic. He stuck to the science—or at least what was being published as science—and didn’t veer off into bullshit speculation or agenda-pushing.

Go back and watch his old videos if you don’t believe me. He reported the data, the evidence, as it came out, no fluff, no spin. But then, as we all started to see, things stopped adding up. The narrative started stinking, and Campbell didn’t flinch. He kept playing it straight, even when it meant questioning the sacred cows. Now, he’s putting out a series of videos that are pulling no punches. He’s diving deep into the disastrous outcomes of these mRNA vaccines—yeah, the ones we were all told to worship as our salvation. Not only that, but he’s also exposing the harm that’s been swept under the rug, deliberately unreported, while shining a light on alternative remedies. And he’s doing it all without any apparent biases or financial conflicts of interest. The man’s not bought, and that’s rarer than a fucking unicorn in this cesspool of a world.

Dr. John Campbell, despite not being a medical doctor, is a goddamn phenomenon. He’s a rare breed—someone who sticks to the evidence, cycle by cycle, without letting personal gain or external pressure twist his take. In a landscape full of grifters and shills, this guy is a beacon of honesty, or at least as close as any human can get. If you’re not following him yet, you’re missing out on one of the few voices worth a damn right now.

No bullshit. I want to talk about Dr. Makis—this isn’t some quack running a shady clinic south of the border in Mexico.

Renowned oncologist, a damn serious player in the field. You can check out his Substack for yourself and see the kind of heat he’s been taking from the authorities up in Canada. If you’re a sensible person with half a brain, you’ve got to stop and ask yourself, why the hell is he being hammered like this?

Is anyone out there claiming his methods don’t work? Are they saying, “Hey, this has been tested clinically and proven to be complete garbage”? No. Not a fucking peep along those lines. Nothing. Zero. Instead, the criticism—if you can even call it that—boils down to one thing: he’s not following the so-called “standard of care” or “intention to treat” protocols. In other words, he’s stepping outside the sacred box of established medical dogma, daring to explore what they label as “alternative treatments.” And guess what? Nobody’s even asking the real question:

But Does it fucking work!!!????

If it does, shouldn’t we be jumping all over it, digging into the data, and figuring out how to make it happen? Nope. Not a shred of curiosity. It’s 100% about the fact that it deviates from the “standard of care”—a standard, by the way, that just so happens to be built entirely on patented pharmaceuticals raking in obscene profits for Big Pharma.

Coincidence?

No.

The answer is no.

Now, I know some of you might roll your eyes and say, “Oh, here we go again with the ‘there’s money in cancer’ conspiracy crap.” Fine. Think what you want.

But.

If there’s nothing else out there, no better option, then sure, you go with the standard treatment—all those highly profitable, patented drugs that have made billions for pharmaceutical giants. You’ve got no choice. But when something else comes along, something promising, something that might—just might—wipe out those profits overnight, the conversation never turns to whether it works. Never. The only accusation, the only charge ever hurled at guys like Dr. Makis, is that it goes against the “standard of treatment.” That’s it. That’s the whole damn case against him.

So, chew on that for a minute. Let it sink in. The system isn’t asking if a treatment could save lives or change the game. It’s not about efficacy or results. It’s about protecting the status quo, the profit machine, and keeping the gravy train rolling. If that doesn’t piss you off, I don’t know what will. Wake the fuck up and start asking the real questions.

Alright, folks, I’m gonna hammer this topic into the ground because it’s that damn important, and I’m pulling no punches. I’ve got a series of screen clips—about half a dozen or so—from Dr. Makis’ Substack to lay out for you. If you’re not familiar, Dr. Makis runs a paid membership gig on Substack, likely because he’s getting attacked from every fucking angle. They’re trying to choke off his money and support, so he’s gotta hustle to keep the lights on. His strategy is clever as hell: the title of every single post is basically the entire punchline of the article. Want the full scoop? Pony up and subscribe. I get these posts via email, sometimes half a dozen in a single day, and let me tell you, if even a fraction of what he’s claiming is true, it’s a goddamn game-changer.

This isn’t some abstract bullshit. We’re talking about truth in an area that hits close to home for damn near everyone. Almost all of us harbor a natural, gut-wrenching fear of debilitating, terminal diseases like cancer. Even the lucky bastards who survive it often find their lives completely derailed. Cancer doesn’t just attack your body; it consumes your entire fucking existence. Even if you reach remission through conventional treatments, the scars—physical, emotional, financial—can ruin you. So, when something comes along that challenges the status quo, you better believe I’m gonna sit up and pay attention.

Here’s the meat of it, something for you to chew on hard. Dr. Makis talks about therapeutic doses of ivermectin and fenbendazole—yeah, the stuff often used as a dewormer for animals, but hold your skepticism for a second. He’s suggesting doses around 100 mg daily of ivermectin and about a gram a day of fenbendazole, taken over a span of roughly three months. The results he’s claiming? Fucking staggering. But here’s the kicker: nobody in the establishment wants to touch this with a ten-foot pole. Why? Because if this pans out, if it’s confirmed, we’re talking about wiping out billions—fucking BILLIONS—of dollars in annual revenue for Big Pharma worldwide. They’ve got their claws deep in the cancer treatment racket, and they’re not about to let some off-label, dirt-cheap alternative fuck up their gravy train.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for drug companies raking in cash when they come up with something that’s truly hot shit, something that genuinely saves lives. Good for them. But if something hotter comes along, something that burns brighter and works better, well, tough fucking luck—that’s just how the ball rolls. Adapt or die. So, I’m throwing this out there for you to mull over. I don’t have all the answers on how to approach this, but I do know we can’t ignore it. The stakes are too damn high. Keep your eyes peeled, question everything, and let’s see where this rabbit hole leads. (If reading by email, this is just a screen shot so you'll need to go to the post to see the gallery and expend.)

This is a pretty high-value post and it's public so far. So now I'm going to turn the tables and add a member's section. A paywall. Don't worry, most of you will have no interest. I like to do these sometimes and it's not to suggest that paying members love these sections.

Most probably don't. My mom doesn't. But the cool thing about it is that my mom loves me anyway.

It's an exclusive club.

... So for this one, it's the story of a Thai gal I've known for about 18 months in a conventional sort of relationship and just a few weeks ago, she began bringing a 2nd girl along when she comes to visit. Twice. Two different gals. Very steamy...

Read more....

WHAT IT'S ABOUT

Free The Animal is an eclectic writing project about everything since November 2003. 21 years, 5,500 posts, 5 million words.

Enough people like it in regular doses to pay me to keep doing it. If you catch the bug, you can manage that right here.