Stingy wages, unpaid overtime, no super... the list goes on ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Almost half of workers aged under 30 have been forced to do unpaid overtime, and a quarter have missed out on super payments, according to a new survey that reveals how employers take advantage of younger workers.

Of more than 2,800 early-career workers who answered the survey, roughly a third were paid $15 per hour or less, while 60% were expected to pay for essentials such as uniforms, protective equipment and fuel.

The insecure job market and a lack of knowledge about workers’ rights were key factors behind the exploitation, say researchers John Howe and Tom Dillon.

Since January 1, employers that mistreat workers face heavy penalties. But the authors say their results show regulators need to target industries where exploitation is still rife.

P.S. Thank you to everyone who’s emailed us with your thoughts on our stories. We read every one of your contributions and each day we publish an edited selection in Your Say, down the bottom of this newsletter. You can always reach us at yoursay@theconversation.edu.au.

Margaret Easterbrook

Business Editor

Almost half of young workers expected to work unpaid overtime, while a quarter aren’t paid compulsory super

John Howe, The University of Melbourne; Tom Dillon, The University of Melbourne

Employers who rip off young workers are more likely to be fined or face jail under new laws introduced in January. But a new study finds more needs to be done.

Antisemitism plan fails on a number of fronts – a contentious definition of hate is just the start

Louise Chappell, UNSW Sydney

The antisemitism strategy could stoke social divisions due to its reliance on biased arguments, weak evidence and overreach in its recommendations.

View from The Hill: Segal’s antisemitism plan gives government controversy, not clarity

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

What was meant to be a moment of clarity has turned into another headache for the government with it’s antisemitism envoy’s plan stirring up some controversy.

Treasury warns the government it may not balance the budget or meet its housing targets

John Hawkins, University of Canberra

Unless we are happy to keep government debt, – which is already close to a trillion dollars – growing indefinitely, taxes will need to rise.

Was the Air India crash caused by pilot error or technical fault? None of the theories holds up – yet

Guido Carim Junior, Griffith University

This tragedy reminds us that aviation safety depends on patient and thorough investigation – not media soundbites or unqualified expert commentary.

Don’t blame toxic masculinity for online misogyny – the manosphere is hurting men too

Kate Cantrell, University of Southern Queensland

The Male Complaint argues it’s unhelpful to blame toxic masculinity for digital misogyny. We should try to understand the manosophere – even if we disagree with it.

Do I have prostate cancer? Why a simple PSA blood test alone won’t give you the answer

Kevin M. Koo, The University of Queensland

Although an elevated PSA measurement can indicate prostate cancer, there can be other reasons for elevated levels.

Many fish are social, but pesticides are pushing them apart

Kyle Morrison, UNSW Sydney

Pesticides have polluted waterways worldwide. Understanding the subtle effects of these chemicals on fish behaviour can help guide better policy and regulation.

Politics + Society

Health + Medicine

Science + Technology

Arts + Culture

Books + Ideas

(Another) data breach
"All these large, profitable businesses fail to protect my data and somehow that now becomes my responsibility, yet I don’t have their vast corporate resources at my disposal. They send me an email most days, put together by their staff, who are paid for their time. There is no compensation offered for the time they are costing me. Just more emails that take more of my time for their error. If Qantas actually cared, they would have their Australian in charge team ringing me and they would be offering me something to make up for their wrong. The Australian government should implement fines high enough and make good provisions that make cybersecurity a real priority for corporate Australia."
Name withheld

We'd love to hear from you. You can email us with your thoughts on our stories and each day we'll publish an edited selection.

 

Featured jobs

View all
Diabetes Australia
Anywhere • Temporary
Charles Darwin University
Darwin NT, Australia • Full Time
University of Tasmania
Hobart TAS, Australia • Full Time
Children's Medical Research Institute
Sydney NSW, Australia • PhD Scholarship
List your job