|
 |
It’s going to be another one of “those” weeks—but then you’ll already know that, which is probably why you’re reading the newsletter. One of the most important developments we’re going to see requires us to go back to events much earlier in this second Trump administration, events that we covered extensively at the time, but that may have faded a bit as they remained on hold in the courts.
 |
On March 15, 2025, a federal judge in the District of Columbia, James Boasberg, learned the administration had deportation flights in progress that likely violated the due process rights of the people on the planes, primarily noncitizens taken into custody in the U.S. who were Venezuelans. Donald Trump had taken an extraordinary step, invoking wartime powers under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act after claiming that the violent Tren de Aragua transnational gang was invading the U.S. The administration said (although in numerous documented cases this subsequently turned out to be untrue) that the men on the planes were members of Tren de Aragua. They were sent to the gulag-style El Salvadoran CECOT prison, with the U.S. footing the bill by paying El Salvador $6 million to imprison roughly 300 men. Americans saw video of the men being herded off the planes in stress positions and being forced to their knees before having the heads shaved.
 |
One of those men, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, became the poster boy for the Trump administration’s cavalier violation of the men’s rights. DHS said he was a hardened criminal, publishing a piece in April, while he was still in custody in El Salvador, that claimed he was an MS-13 Gang member with a history of violence. The piece quotes DHS Secretary Kristi Noem as saying: “We hear far too much in the mainstream media about sob stories of gang members and criminal illegals and not enough about their victims.” It continues: “The mainstream media has peddled a sob story about Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The facts are he is an illegal alien from El Salvador, a MS-13 gang member, and has a history of violence.” But that was not the case. He was subsequently returned to the U.S. in June.
The ensuing legal dispute took on dimensions well beyond Abrego Garcia’s personal situation and elevated over concerns that Justice Department lawyers had been less than forthcoming with the court. Judge Boasberg even contemplated contempt proceedings against the government. “The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders — especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it,” he wrote in his opinion on April 16.
 |
But those contempt proceedings were put on hold for seven months while the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia considered the matter. After an original panel decision finding Judge Boasberg lacked the ability to initiate contempt was abruptly reversed, the full court declined to rehear the matter en banc. The court, rather obliquely, wrote, “no member of this court has taken the position that the panel’s disposition stands in the way of the district court proceeding just as it intended to do.” Judge Boasberg concluded last Wednesday that meant he was free to move forward on contempt, starting with a factual inquiry into what happened so he can determine whether it’s appropriate to make a criminal referral. That means witnesses, testifying under oath, to determine who issued the directive to defy the Judge’s order that prohibited sending the men to El Salvador. The Judge seemed inclined to make up for lost time: “Justice requires me to move promptly.”
Judge Boasberg indicated he would issue an order advising the parties about how he wants to proceed on Monday. It’s likely he will require testimony from former DOJ lawyer turned whistleblower Erez Reuveni and DOJ lawyer Drew Ensign. DOJ’s likely response will be to raise all sorts of objections and re-challenge the legitimacy of the proceedings.
The response from administration allies didn’t take long and predictably continued the president’s string of attacks on federal judges. Less than an hour after Judge Boasberg made his intentions clear, the Heritage Foundation tweeted that judges whose decisions it doesn’t like should be impeached.
 |
Stay tuned: We’ll hear from the Lee Gelernt, the ACLU lawyer representing the deported men, in a Substack Live on Monday at 4:15 p.m. EST about his plans to go back before Judge Boasberg and present new evidence from the whistleblower that the government deliberately violated the court’s order not to hand over the Venezuelan men to El Salvador. If you have any questions you want me to ask Lee, please leave them in the comments.
This case is critically important because it goes to the heart of this administration’s efforts to supplant the rule of law with the whims of a would-be dictator. Trump thought he could d