Insights for Solo Chiefs and the human-agent teams they orchestrate. Life is a perpetual ping-pong between exploration and execution, divergence and convergence. So it is with my Substack. When I landed on this platform (March last year), I gave myself a year to figure out what the hell I was doing. What topics to write about. Which audience to focus on. I’ve got two months left on the clock, but it seems I’ve finally found clarity. At least for myself. Last year, I explored topics like the future of work, the end of the agile industry, writing with AI, networked agentic organizations, M-skilled people, sociotechnical systems, hallucinations of humans and AI, and a dozen other rabbit holes. But none of that tackled a concrete problem. None of my articles addressed a Job-to-Be-Done. That changes now. Some people say that when you want to build a successful product or service, scratch your own itch. Solve your own biggest problem. Make your own work-life less miserable, then share your approach with everyone else who’s equally screwed. Well, I am (and have always been) the single manager and leader of a creative business. I orchestrate tools, systems, humans, and now AI agents to accomplish what others attempt with an entire team of managers. I am a Solo Chief. And it’s frickin’ hard. Recently, I realized the future of work is barreling toward a world with more Solo Chiefs. Solopreneurs are multiplying; single founders are becoming standard issue, and a growing number of intrapreneurs, business unit managers, and traditional managers find themselves solely accountable for the success of their unit. Maybe you’ve got the same problem: Customers, suppliers, colleagues, shareholders, partners … They’re all looking at you. You are the single wringable neck. And you wouldn’t want it any other way. My brother-in-law, who runs his own web store as a one-person operation, told me over Christmas dinner, “Whatever goes wrong, I can only blame myself. I’m the only one who’s accountable. And I’m loving it.” I want to write for people like me, who are accountable for their own organization. Doesn’t matter if it’s a one-person startup or a 100-person business unit, a single creator commanding an army of AI agents, or a lead intrapreneur hoarding colleagues and freelancers toward an objective. What matters is that their sole responsibility is brutally hard. They’re doing the best they can, but they wouldn’t have it any other way. Because nothing beats the feeling of, “I worked with many tools and people, and I got a ton of help, but in the end, I was the one who led this venture.” For the past fifteen years, I’ve worked with several great teams on a variety of businesses. Management 3.0, Happy Melly, Agility Scales, Shiftup, and unFIX. It’s always been a pleasure to share the burden and achievements with a crew of professionals and enthusiasts. But no matter which way I turned it, each venture was still my little kingdom. My company. My business. Sure, teamwork is great. But in most contexts, “team” is just shorthand for “one person and all the help they can get.” It’s a bit like being Prime Minister. Legally, you’re first among equals. And officially, you work as a team. But guess what? At the end of the day, everyone’s looking at you. Only one person can sit in the central chair. And from the perspective of owners, citizens, and shareholders, there’s only ever one head on the block. Zed offered me the following suggestions for the Job-to-Be-Done:
I’m not sure yet which version I prefer. For now, that doesn’t matter. I want to offer a big thanks to the latest readers who’ve upgraded their subscriptions: Patric Palm, Oscar Mestre, Bas Geertsema, Alexandet Schön, Sean, |