Here's how income tax brackets actually work ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

This week, Labor’s NSW Premier Chris Minns unexpectedly appeared to side with the Coalition over its plans to tackle “bracket creep” on income tax.

Minns said if you pay the top marginal tax rate of 47%, you are “working Monday, Tuesday and half of Wednesday for yourself, and then Wednesday, Thursday and Friday for the government”.

But is that true? We asked tax expert Helen Hodgson to explain exactly how tax rates work, and how Australia stacks up against other countries.

And, purely by way of example, we ran the calculator over the tax payable on Minns’ own salary of $348,301.

On another note, thanks to everyone who has contributed in the first few days of our donations campaign. It’s heartening to see so many people value what we do. You can make a donation here.

Liz Minchin

Executive Editor + Business Editor

 

Do Australians really ‘work half the week’ just to pay their income tax? See for yourself

Helen Hodgson, Curtin University

Do some people work ‘Monday, Tuesday, and half of Wednesday for yourself, and then Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday for the government’? No, they don’t.

Best reads this week

Trump's face in front of a stock market ticker chart

Making millions: the suspicious oil bets just before Trump posts

Timothy Graham, Ella Chorazy, Stephen Harrington, and The Conversation Digital Storytelling Team

Hundreds of millions of dollars are being made on well-timed oil bets occurring just before Trump posts. But can we call it insider trading?

Taunting and degrading civilians in armed conflict is a clear violation of international law

Shannon Bosch, Edith Cowan University

Israeli treatment of the detained flotilla activists has outraged the world. This is why international law matters in conflicts.

Timmy the stranded whale is dead. Please, let’s put animal welfare first and human emotion second

Vanessa Pirotta, Macquarie University

Like everyone, I cared about Timmy. We all did. But our responses need to be ethical.

‘Forever renting’ is common in New York, California and Europe. What lessons can we learn?

Dorina Pojani, The University of Queensland

The first step is rethinking the way we view housing – as home and shelter rather than an investment or commodity.

15 Australian companies switched to a four-day work week. It went surprisingly well

John L. Hopkins, Deakin University

All but one of the companies researchers studied decided to continue with a four-day work week. And none reported a loss of productivity.

TC Weekly podcast

Politics with Michelle Grattan: Margaret Thornton on the landmark Tickle v Giggle transgender case

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

The anti-discrimination expert explains what the case was about, why it’s set for an appeal – and the broader implications if the decision stands.

The Making of One Nation: podcast out now

Ashlynne McGhee, The Conversation; Isabella Podwinski, The Conversation

For 30 years, One Nation and Pauline Hanson have been ridiculed, dismissed and shut out. Now, no one is laughing. This is the story of how a party built on fear and grievance thrived, died and rose again to upend Australian politics.

Our most-read article this week

What is the ‘Thucydides trap’ Xi warned Trump about? Lessons from an ancient war between Athens and Sparta

David M. Pritchard, The University of Queensland

What did Thucydides really say on this? And what’s Athens and Sparta got to do with the current state of US-China relations?

In case you missed this week's big stories

Ensuring our economic sovereignty
“Your article on digital sovereignty in Australia raises an important issue – but it doesn’t go far enough. The challenge isn’t just where our data sits; it’s where the value flows. Nearly everything we use online is controlled by global tech giants structured to minimise tax and extract wealth from Australian markets into the United States and China. The same dynamic exists across sectors like mining, oil and gas – profits leave, while Australians are left debating sovereignty in narrow terms. If we are serious about digital sovereignty, we need to broaden the conversation to economic sovereignty. This means looking at models that ensure a far greater share of revenue generated in Australia stays in Australia. Equally, we should consider ownership structures. Australia has precedent in resource sectors – why not extend similar thinking to the digital economy? Policies that prioritise majority Australian equity ownership, or at least enforce stronger local participation, would fundamentally rebalance where value is retained. Digital sovereignty without economic reform risks becoming symbolic. If we don’t address how wealth is extracted, we’re not protecting Australia – we’re simply hosting other nations’ balance sheets.”
Scott Draffin

We'd love to hear from you. You can email us with your thoughts on our stories and each day we'll publish an edited selection.

 

Featured jobs

View all
Government of South Australia
Adelaide SA, Australia • Full Time
Swinburne University of Technology
Hawthorn VIC, Australia • Full Time
List your job