| Forwarded this email? Subscribe for more |
 |
| By The Free Press |
It’s Wednesday, July 29. This is The Front Page, your daily window into the world of The Free Press—and our take on the world at large.
Every once in a while, it feels like world events converge on one spot. Yesterday was such an occasion, which is why we’re doing something a little different with today’s Front Page: focusing on the one story that we think matters most, and helping you make sense of it with some of the voices we trust the most.
Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu both found themselves in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday. The two men are among the most consequential figures in the world, and they were in town to meet with the most consequential: President Donald Trump. Both lead a crucial and controversial U.S. ally. Both have hot and cold relationships with Trump. And, in Oval Office meetings ahead of the funeral of the late U.S. senator Lindsey Graham, both had similar requests: for continued American backing in their fights on the front lines of the West.
A few days earlier, Ukraine’s war with Russia, and Israel and the U.S.’s war with Iran, had become connected more directly than ever before, when Ukraine struck an Iranian cargo ship in the Caspian Sea that it said was carrying military equipment between Iran and Russia.
So where do these two vital alliances stand? And what came of yesterday’s meetings? For answers to those questions, we turn to Elliott Abrams, who was the Special Representative for Iran and Venezuela in the first Trump administration, supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for George W. Bush, and served in the State Department during all eight years of the Reagan administration. Read his piece to understand not only the fateful relationships between Trump, Bibi, and Zelensky, but the strategic big picture that they are so central to.
If you believe the conventional wisdom, the biggest constraint on American support for its allies—and the U.S. war effort against Iran—is practical. Trump officials blamed America’s thin munitions stockpile for the president’s pause on Iran over the weekend. But Park MacDougald argues that there is more to the story, and that the dovish views of the people sounding the alarm give away more than the shortage does. He also follows the munitions debate to its darkest end: the nightmare scenario in which America finds itself fighting a third war, against a much more formidable foe.
From the war in the Middle East to the deadliest conflict in Europe since the Second World War. Now in its fourth year, the Ukraine war shows no sign of slowing. The Free Press’s Tanya Lukyanova has been periodically traveling back to her hometown of Moscow since the start of the conflict. Today she reports on her latest trip, and a big change in the Russian capital: from gas-ration lines and drone stories to flat stares, she finds Muscovites more awake than ever to the cost of Putin’s war. “Nobody can explain what we’re fighting for,” one person told her. “Why do people die every day? To what end?’
And in Kyiv, a convert who finally saw the light. MAGA influencer Laura Loomer, who once insisted Ukraine started the war, has seen the front lines and now says she “was bamboozled by Russian propaganda.” Eli Lake spoke to this Trump World thought leader about why she changed her mind.
—The Editors
 |
Ask Tough Love’s Editor Anything
Calling all Abigail Shrier fanatics: Submit your questions for an AMA with Tough Love editor Freya Sanders. On July 30 at noon ET, Freya will coach you on how to get your letter into Abigail’s inbox—and answer your questions live. Only paid subscribers can submit questions via this thread—become one today for access to the Free Press Forum, Tough Love, livestreams, and much more.
 |
|
