Media academic and former Bachelor contestant on why we can’t look away

When reality TV becomes too real – and why we can’t look away | The Guardian

Support the Guardian

Fund independent journalism

Saved for Sunday - The Guardian
Snezana Markoski and Sam Wood on the 2015 run of The Bachelor Australia

When reality TV becomes too real – and why we can’t look away

In today’s newsletter, a reality TV academic – and former Bachelor contestant – speaks with us about the attachments we form with romance reality participants in the wake of a domestic violence charge against a former star. We also recommend Troye Sivan’s new album, a five-star play and some excellent reads

 
Alyx Gorman Alyx Gorman
 

Good morning. This week my social media feed has been filled with people expressing shock and even betrayal following the news that fitness influencer and former Bachelor star Sam Wood has been charged with domestic violence. His lawyer said in court on Thursday that Wood denied the allegations. To understand the specific attachment we form with romance reality stars, I’ve spoken with Dr Rebecca Trelease – Alyx

 
Advertisement
 

We can’t stop talking about: The Bachelor

Dr Rebecca Trelease is a senior lecturer at Auckland University of Technology’s school of communication studies in New Zealand, and during the first year of her PhD, she was also a participant on The Bachelor New Zealand. She’s been a “massive fan” of reality television since the early Big Brother days, and believes many fans engage with popular culture in a critical, scholarly way – regardless of their formal qualifications. But of her time on camera, and the media coverage surrounding it, she says: “It was really fascinating to see it first-hand, but it was also really awful at times and I wouldn’t recommend it.”

Alyx: Tell me a bit about the media cycle surrounding romance reality shows, and the connections that viewers are encouraged to develop with the cast?
Rebecca: In romance reality, in some shows we want to see a main hero looking for love across the season, while in others, we want to see two individuals come together and follow them from meeting at the altar, to “are they gonna stay together at the end?”.

But we’re watching a person who’s put their face and their voice to a character that they don’t have a lot of control over, because you have a story producer with more power who is going to present what you do. Then you have an audience, and the way they perceive your story as well. So you have the participant, you have the audience and you have the producer. For a show to be believable, those three angles need to align.

Alyx: I’d love for you to talk to me a bit about what we as viewers don’t get to see.
Rebecca: It depends on the filming setup. The show I was on, and you could put something like Married at First Sight into the same category, the contestants or participants are having conversations with producers in the moment. In those interviews where they’re saying “right now we’re on a date”, you have people and a camera crew and lighting set up, and we don’t see any of that in the show.

Having someone with a giant camera in your face has to have an impact on participants. Whereas watching something like Love Island is amazing, because you’ve got those surveillance cameras and you have the mics around their necks. They’re wearing them 24/7, so I can imagine it would be much easier to forget that you’re actually being recorded.

Alyx: Can you tell me about the reaction from viewers after the cameras stop?
Rebecca: When a show is about a fundamental human thing, like falling in love, how you were presented is going to stick around for a very long time. From my experience, as a participant, there were viewers who would tell me who I was. Even men sending DMs who believe that you would be their perfect partner, because of what they saw of you on a show. It’s very strange, but that’s what happens.

When you watch 40 hours of something across a season – it’s a long time. You as a viewer have invested so many hours and you believed this. And so if you were wrong, would you want to blame yourself as the viewer for getting it wrong? Would you blame the show for presenting it in the wrong way – which isn’t encouraged by production because the show has a lot of money on the line?

Alyx: What advice would you offer to people who are upset about what has happened this week?
Rebecca: I don’t think I have any advice to offer, but to keep in mind that when you have one man who is ultimately positioned as the hero of an entire season, you are, as a viewer, meant to be invested in his journey. Producers tell you he is so worthy, and he is so swoony and romantic – it is a really massive pedestal to put someone on.

 

Your week ahead

Troye Sivan
camera Photograph: Marcus Cooper

What to watch | Speaking of reality TV, Wendy Syfret’s Stream Team column on House of Stassi (Disney+) had me so immediately addicted to the Vanderpump Rules spin-off – about insanely watchable hyper-villain Stassi Schroeder – that I almost took a fake day off to binge it. “You don’t need to be a reality TV producer to understand what this show was supposed to be,” Syfret writes. Reader: it does not go well – Steph Harmon, culture editor

What to play | “There seems no reason whatsoever why Troye Sivan [pictured above] should still be a relative cult figure within pop, rather than an actual multiplatinum star,” writes Alexis Petridis, in his rave review of Sivan’s latest album She’s the Best, which is responsible for the worst lyrics and best film clip of the year. But counterpoint: “If he were a huge star, would he be allowed to be as loudly, unapologetically queer?” – Steph

What to read | How about the behind-the-scenes account of one of the greatest love stories of our time? That’s right, Niles and Daphne from Frasier. Actors Jane Leeves and David Hyde Pierce spoke to Hollie Richardson about shaping the best romance to grace a sitcom and how they both landed hot husbands in real life. She calls him “devastatingly sexy”; he calls her “the best loon in the business”. It is everything you could want – Sian Cain, deputy culture editor

What to cook | There’s no stirring, barely any chopping and cheeses in the plural. Which is to say, Alice Zaslavsky’s shortcut beetroot risotto will have you tickled pink – Yvonne C Lam, deputy lifestyle editor

What to book | It’s not every day our theatre critic Cassie Tongue goes with a full five stars – but A Room with a View, adapted by Grace Chapple and directed by Hannah Goodwin for Belvoir St theatre in Sydney, “touches the divine”. “This play is alive, and it’s a gift,” she writes – and it’s on in Sydney until 1 November, when it transfers to Melbourne on 14 November, and heads to Perth from 5 March – Steph

Advertisement
 

Wishlist

A vintage button.
camera Photograph: Etsy / Mayfieldhousevintage

A combination of learning the recent Dior show featured murano glass buttons and realising one of my jackets would be enlivened by finer fixings has sent me scrolling through hundreds of vintage buttons lately. I’m not a connoisseur, so I can’t tell you whether this 1930s goldfish bowl button is good value at $30; but it is fun to look at teeny tiny works of art and imagine them on your clothing. I’ve been particularly impressed by the range and prices at Carola’s Choices Etsy store – Alyx

 

Open tabs

This great read has graphs! They chart the grim downward trajectory that Americans are on (double-digit declines) when it comes to socialising over the last 30 years. We’re talking sporting events, going to a bar, playing cards, volunteering. And they definitely don’t throw dinner parties. The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson asks why – Sophie Black, associate editor, features, lifestyle and culture

Sink into your couch for this part book-review/part-long form essay. David Schurman Wallace reflects on the work of lauded nature writer John McPhee and the “vanishing privilege” of long form nature writing in a world where our attention spans, and the natural world around us, is rapidly diminishing – Sophie

 

Tell us …

Buttons in a basket sitting on the floor.
camera Photograph: Sophie Black/The Guardian

Do you have a treasured old biscuit tin full of buttons on the shelf at home? A glass jar full of them? Maybe that’s a relic of a byegone era. I’ll admit that I struggle to sew a button on, let alone keep a collection. I do, however, own my mother’s old sewing basket – one that she lined and decorated herself, complete with matching pin cushion. She’s an expert quilter (and yet failed to hand down a skerrick of that talent to me). Send a photo of your button collection if you have one, or at least a single favourite button, by replying to this email or contacting me via savedforlater@theguardian.com – Sophie

 
 

… there is a very good reason why not to support the Guardian

Not everyone can afford to pay for news. That is why our website is open to everyone.

But – if you can afford to do so – here are three good reasons why you might consider becoming a Guardian supporter today:

1

Your funding means we can be completely independent

2